147m 4 181 3 m2 - 4725 G F H A B FIG. 9.

BC, BD, AD, in P, Q, R, S (fig. 9). Then the section of the pyramid by this plane is the parallelogram Pqrs. By drawing Ac and Ad parallel to BC and BD, so as to meet the plane through CD in *c* and *d,* and producing QP and RS to meet Ac and Ad in *q * and r, we see that the area of Pqrs is (*x/h - x 2 /h 2) X* area of cCDd; this also is a quadratic function of x. The proposition can then be established for a prismoid generally by the method of § 27 (iv). The formula is known as the *prismoidal formula. 59. Moments. - Since* all points on any ordinate are at an equal distance from the axis of u, it is easily shown that the first moment (with regard to this axis) of a trapezette whose ordinate is u is equal to the area of a trapezette whose ordinate is *xu;* and this area can be found by the methods of the preceding sections in cases where u is an algebraical function of *x.* The formulae can then be applied to finding the moments of certain volumes.

In the case of the parabolic trapezette, for instance, *xu* is of degree 3 in x, and therefore the first moment is lh(xouo+4xlui-+x2u2). In the case, therefore, of any solid whose cross-section at distance x from one end is a quadratic function of *x,* the position of the crosssection through the centroid is to be found by determining the position of the centre of gravity of particles of masses proportional to So, S2, and 4S 1, placed at the extremities and the middle of a line drawn from one end of the solid to the other. The centroid of a hemisphere of radius R, for instance, is the same as the centroid of particles of masses 0, 7rR **2**, and 4. lirR **2**, placed at the extremities and the middle of its axis; *i.e.* the centroid is at distance 8R from the plane face.

60. The method can be extended to finding the second, third,. .. moments of a trapezette with regard to the axis of u. If u is an algebraical function of *x* of degree not exceeding *p,* and if the area of a trapezette, for which the ordinate *v* is of degree not exceeding *p+q,* may be expressed by a formula Aovo-1--yivi+.. +Amvm, the qth moment of the trapezette is Aoxo 4 uo+Xix1 4 ui+ ... -1-Amxm'um, and the mean value of *x°* is (AoxoQuo + Alx1 4 u1 + ... + Amxm°um)/(Aouo + A1u1+ ... *An,um). * The calculation of this last expression is simplified by noticing that we are only concerned with the mutual ratios of Xo, X 1, ... and of *uo, u1,.. ,* not with their actual values.

To extend these methods to a briquette, where the ordinate u is an algebraical function of *x* and *y,* the axes of *x* and of *y* being parallel to the sides of the base, we consider that the area of a section at distance *x* from the plane *x = o * is expressed in terms of the ordinates in which it intersects the series of planes, parallel to y=o, through the given ordinates of the briquette (§ 44); and that the area of the section is then represented by the ordinate of a trapezette. This ordinate will be an algebraical function of *x,* and we can again apply a suitable formula. Suppose, for instance, that *u* is of degree not exceeding 3 in x, and of degree not exceeding 3 in *y,* that it contains terms in *x3y3, x 3 y 2, x2y3,* &c.; and suppose that the edges parallel to which *x* and *y * are measured are of lengths 2h and *3k,* the briquette being divided into six elements by the plane *x=xo+h* and the planes *y = yo+k, y = yo+2k,* and that the 12 ordinates forming the edges of these six elements are given. The areas of the sides for which *0* and x=xo+2h, and of the section by the plane *x=xo+h,* may be found by Simpson's second formula; call these Ao and A2, and Al. The area of the section by a plane at distance x from the edge 0 is a function of *x* whose degree is the same as that of *u. * Hence Simpson's formula applies, and the volume is lh(A0-I-4A1+ A2).

The process is simplified by writing down the general formula first and then substituting the values of u. The formula, in the above case, is 3h{ *k(uo,o + 3 where u 0 ,0 denotes the ordinate for which *x=xo+Oh, y=yo+c¢k * The result is the same as if we multiplied lk(vo 3v1+3v2 + v 3) by lh(uo 4u1 +u2), and then replaced uovo, uov1, .. by uo,o, uo,i .. The multiplication is shown in the adjoining diagram; the factors s ands are kept outside, so that the sum uo,o+3uo,1+ ... +4u1,o+..

can be calculated before it is multiplied by *3h .* 1k.

62. The above is a particular case of a general principle that the obtaining of an expression such as Ih(uo+4u1+u2) or lk(vo-1-3v 1 +3v 2 +v 3) is an *operation* performed on uo or vo, and that this operation is the suns of a number of operations such as that which obtains 3huo or 1kvo. The volume of the briquette for which *u* is a function of *x* and *y* is found by the operation of double integration, consisting of two successive operations, one being with regard to x, and the other with regard to *y;* and these operations may (in the cases with which we are concerned) be performed in either order. Starting from any ordinate *ue,o,* the result of integrating with regard to *x* through a distance 2h is (in the example considered in § 61) the same as the result of the operation 3h(I + 4E + E 2), where E r denotes the operation of changing x into *x+h* (see Differences, Calculus oF). The integration with regard to *y* may similarly (in the particular example) be replaced by the operation ak(I+3E'-+3E'2+E'3), where E' denotes the change of *y* into *y + k.* The result of performipg both operations, in order to obtain the volume, is the result of the operation denoted by the product of these two expressions; and in this product the powers of E and of E' may be dealt with according to algebraical laws.

The methods of §§ 59 and 60 can similarly be extended to finding the position of the central ordinate of a briquette, or the mean q th of elements of the briquette from a principal plane.

63. (C) *Mensuration of Graphs Generally. - We* have next to consider the extension of the preceding methods to cases in which u is not necessarily an algebraical function of *x* or of *x* and *y. * The general principle is that the numerical data from which a particular result is to be deduced are in general not exact, but are given only to a certain degree of accuracy. This limits the accuracy of the result; and we can therefore replace the figure by another figure which coincides with it approximately, provided that the further inaccuracy so introduced is comparable with the original inaccuracies of measurement.

The relation between the inaccuracy of the data and the additional inaccuracy due to substitution of another figure is similar to the relation between the inaccuracies in mensuration of a figure which is supposed to be of a given form (§ 20). The volume of a frustum of a cone, for instance, can be expressed in terms of certain magnitudes by a certain formula; but not only will there be some error in the measurement of these magnitudes, but there is not any material figure which is an exact cone. The formula may, however, be used if the deviation from conical form is relatively less than the errors of measurement. The conditions are thus similar to those which arise in interpolation (q.v.). The data are the same in both cases. In the case of a trapezette, for instance, the data are the magnitudes of certain ordinates; the problem of interpolation is to determine the values of intermediate ordinates, while that of mensuration is to determine the area of the figure of which these are the ordinates. If, as is usually the case, the ordinate throughout each strip of the trapezette can be expressed approximately as an algebraical function of the abscissa, the application of the integral calculus gives the area of the figure.

64. There are three classes of cases to be considered. In the case of mathematical functions certain conditions of continuity are satisfied, and the extent to which the value given by any particular formula differs from the true value may be estimated within certain limits; the main inaccuracy, in favourable cases, being due to the fact that the numerical data are not absolutely exact. In physical and mechanical applications, where concrete measurements are involved, there is, as pointed out in the preceding section, the additional inaccuracy due to want of exactness in the figure itself. In the case of statistical data there is the further difficulty that there is no real continuity, since we are concerned with a finite number of individuals.

The proper treatment of the deviations from mathematical accuracy, in the second and third of the above classes of cases, is a special matter. In what follows it will be assumed that the conditions of continuity (which imply the continuity not only of *u* but also of some of its differential coefficients) are satisfied, subject to the small errors in the values of u actually given; the limits of these errors being known.

65. It is only necessary to consider the trapezette and the briquette, since the cases which occur in practice can be reduced to one or other of these forms. In each case the data are the values of certain equidistant ordinates, as described in §§ 43-45. The terms *quadratureformula* and *cubature-formula* are sometimes restricted to formulae for expressing the area of a trapezette, or the volume of a briquette, in terms of such data. Thus a quadrature-formula is a formula for expressing [A x .24] or *fudx* in terms of a series of given values of *u,* while a cubature-formula is a formula for expressing *[[Vx, 0 .* u]] or *ffudxdy* in terms of the values of u for certain values of *x* in combination with certain values of *y;* these values not necessarily lying within the limits of the integrations.

66. There are two principal methods. The first, which is the best known but is of limited application, consists in replacing each successive portion of the figure by another figure whose ordinate is an algebraical function of *x* or of x and *y,* and expressing the area or volume of this latter figure (exactly or approximately) in terms of the given ordinates. The second consists in taking a comparatively simple expression obtained in this way, and introducing corrections which involve the values of ordinates at or near the boundaries of the figure. The various methods will be considered first for the trapezette, the extensions to the briquette being only treated briefly.

I | 4 | I | |

I | I | I | |

3 | 3 | 1 2 | 3 |

3 | 3 | 12 | 3 |

I | I | 4 | I |

The simplest method is to replace the trapezette by a series of trapezia. If the data are uo, u 1,.

um, the figure formed by joining the tops of these ordinates is a trapezoid whose area is h(Iuo -}- ui+u2 -I-

+ um-1 + Ium>. This is called the *trapezoidal* or *chordal* area, and will be denoted by C1. If the data are u;, U I, ... *u m _ 4 ,* we can form a series of trapezia by drawing the tangents at the extremities of these ordinates; the sum of the areas of these trapezia will be h(u 4 .+u 2 +... +um_4). This is called the *tangential* area, and will be denoted by T1. The - - 4X + g tangential area may be expressed in terms of chordal areas. If we write CI for the chordal area obtained by taking ordinates at intervals Zh, then T i =2CI-C I. If the trapezette, as seen from above, is everywhere convex or everywhere concave, the true area lies between C 1 and T1.

68. *Other Rules for Trapezettes. - The* extension of this method consists in dividing the trapezette into minor trapezettes, each consisting of two or more strips, and replacing each of these minor trapezettes by a new figure, whose ordinate *v* is an algebraical function of x; this function being c h osen so that the new figure shall coincide with the original figure so far as the given ordinates are concerned. This means that, if the minor trapezette consists of *k * strips, *v* will be of degree *k* or k - I in *x,* according as the data are the bounding ordinates or the mid-ordinates. If A denotes the true area of the original trapezette, and B the aggregate area of the substituted figures, we have A B, where 41-denotes approximate equality. The value of B is found by the methods of §§ 49-55. The following are some examples.

(i) Suppose that the bounding ordinates are given, and that m is a multiple of 2. Then we can take the strips in pairs, and treat each pair as a parabolic trapezette. Applying Simpson's formula to each of these, we have A -__9= **h(uo +* 4 14 1 + u2) + 3 h (14 2 + 4u3 + u4) + .. _f)_ 111040+ 4u1 + 2u2 + 4 u 3 + 2464 +. .. + 214m-2 + 4 u m-i + um)This is *Simpson's rule. * (ii) Similarly, if m is a multiple of 3, the repeated application of Simpson's second formula gives *Simpson's second rule * A 1? -gh(uo+3ui+3u2+ 2 143+3 14 4+... +314m_4+2um-3+ 314m_2 + 314m_1 + um).

(iii) If mid-ordinates are given, and *m* is a multiple of 3, the repeated application of the formula of § 55 will give A -??- ah(3u + 2u *3 +* 3u; + 3u; +.. *+ 2um-? + Su m _). * 69. The formulae become complicated when the number of strips in each of the minor trapezettes is large. The method is then modified by replacing B by an expression which gives the areas of the substituted figures approximately. This introduces a further inaccuracy; but this latter may be negligible in comparison with the main inaccuracies already involved (cf. § 20 (iii)).

Suppose, for instance, that m=6, and that we consider the trapezette as a whole; the data being the bounding ordinates. Since there are seven of these, *v* will be of degree 6 in x; and we shall have (§ 54 (i)) B =6h(v 3 + 6 2 v3 + 20 14v 3 + i 4 1 1 b 6v 3) = 6h(u3+2.6 2 u3 + 2 OS 4 u3 +? O16u3)If we replace 440136u3 in this expression by g405 6 u 3, the method of § 68 gives A -Q *AIL h* (uo + 5 u 1 + u2 + 6u3 + u4 + 5 14 6 + us); the expression on the right-hand side being an approximate expression for B, and differing from it only by s1eH5 6 u 3. This is *Weddle's rule.* If m is a multiple of 6, we can obtain an expression for A by applying the rule to each group of six strips.

70. Some of the formulae obtained by the above methods can be expressed more simply in terms of chordal or tangential areas taken in various ways. Consider, for example, Simpson's rule (§ 68 (i)). The expression for A can be written in the form h(2 uo + ul+ u2 + u3 +

+ um-2+ um -1 + 2 u m) 3 h (2140+ u2 + u. *2um)** Now, if p is any factor of m, there is a series of equidistant ordinates uo, up, 142p, *um - p, um; and the chordal area as determined by these ordinates is ph (2uo + *up + u2p +. ... + u m-p + zum*), which may be denoted by Cp. With this notation, the area as given by Simpson's rule may be written in the form sC l - 3 C2 or CI+ 1 3 `-(C1C2). The following are some examples of formulae of this kind, in terms of chordal areas.

(i) m a multiple of 2 (Simpson's rule).

A -ns (4 C i - C2 C1 + 1(C1 - C2).

(ii) m a multiple of 3 (Simpson's second rule).

' 1(9 C 1 - C 3) -` i - C1 + -s(C 1 - C3).

(*iii) m* a multiple of 4.

A -n- (64C1 - 20C2+C4) ' R C 1+9 (C 1 - C2) ?1(C l - C4).

(*iv) m* a multiple of 6 (Weddle's rule, or its repeated application).

A ?- *(1 5 C 16C 2+ C 3) C1 +$(C i - C2) -lO(C 2 - C3)(v) m a multiple of 12.

A 41311 (56C 1 - 28C 2 + 8C 3 - C4) C1+2(Ci - C2) - (C2 - C3) + s i s(C3 - C4).

There are similar formulae in terms of the tangential areas T1, Thus (iii) of § 68 may be written A -a -1-(9T 1 - T3).

71. The general method of constructing the formulae of § 7 0 for chordal areas is that, if p, *q, r, ...* are *k* of the factors (including 1) of *m,* we take A -IPCp+ Q C 4+ RC ,. +.. ., where P, Q, R, ... satisfy the *k* equations P+Q+R+...

Pp2 + Q q2 + Rr 2 + ... Pp4-I-Qg4+Rr4+....

- + Q g2k-2 *+* 2k The last k - I of these equations give I /P: I /Q 1/R. .. = p2 (p2 - q2) (p 2 - r2) q2 (q2 - p2) (q2 r 2). ... 7.2(y2 - p 2) (r 2 - q 2). ... .

Combining this with the first equation, we obtain the values of P, Q, R, .. .

The same method applies for tangential areas, by taking A -2 PTp -}- QT 4 + RT r + .. .

provided that p, *q, r, ...* are odd numbers.

72. The justification of the above methods lies in certain properties of the series of successive differences of *u.* The fundamental assumption is that each group of strips of the trapezette may be replaced by a figure for which differences of u, above those of a certain order, vanish (§ 54). The legitimacy of this assumption, and of the further assumption which enables the area of the new figure to be expressed by an approximate formula instead of by an exact formula, must be verified in every case by reference to the actual differences.

The preceding methods, though apparently simple, are open to various objections in practice, such as the following: (i) The assignment of different coefficients of different ordinates, and even the selection of ordinates for the purpose of finding C3, &c. (§ 70), is troublesome. (ii) This assignment of different coefficients means that different weights are given to different ordinates; and the relative weights may not agree with the relative accuracies of measurement. (iii) Different formulae have to be adopted for different values of *m;* the method is therefore unsuitable for the construction of a table giving successive values of the area up to successive ordinates. (iv) In order to find what formula may be applied, it is necessary to take the successive differences of *u;* and it is then just as easy, in most cases, to use a formula which directly involves these differences and therefore shows the degree of accuracy of the approximation.

The alternative method, therefore, consists in taking a simple formula, such as the trapezoidal rule, and correcting it to suit the mutual relations of the differences.

74. To illustrate the method, suppose that we use the chordal area C1, and that the trapezette is in fact parabolic. The difference between C 1 and the true area is made up of a series of areas bounded by chords and arcs; this difference becoming less as we subdivide the figure into a greater number of strips.

The fact that C 1 does not give the true area is due to the fact that in passing from one extremity of the top of any strip to the other extremity the tangent to the trapezette E, _- changes its direction. We have therefore B in the first place to see whether the difference can be expressed in terms of the directions of the tangents.

Let Kabl (fig. to) be one of the strips, of breadth *h.* Draw the tangents at A and B, meeting at T; and through T draw a line parallel to KA and LB, meeting the arc AB in C and the chord AB in V. Draw AD and BE perpendicular to this line, and DF and TG perpendicular to LB. Then AD =EB = 2h, and the triangles AVD and BVE are equal.

The area of the trapezette is less (in fig. to) than the area of the trapezium Kabl by two-thirds of the area of the triangle ATB (§ 34). This latter area is Obte -Datd = Abtg-Datd = 8h2 tan GTB - *$h2* tan DAT. Hence, if the angle which the tangent at the extremity of the ordinate u 0 makes with the axis of *x* is denoted by *fie,* we have area from *uo* to u1= 2h(uo + ui) - -- i i h 2 (tan y l - tan t u 2 = Wu ' + *u2) -* 1 Tih 2 (tan 4,2 - tan um-1 t0 26 m, - 2 h(um-1 + um) i h (tan 4, m - and thence, by summation, A =C I - i i h 2 (tan - tan 1,1/o).

This, in the notation of §§ 46 and 54, may be written *? * Since *h =* H/m, the inaccuracy in taking C I as the area varies as I /m2.

It might be shown in the same way that A=Ti+ ih 2 (tan Yamtan 4) = T1 + [h2u]::.

75. The above formulae apply only to a parabolic trapezette. Their generalization is given by the *Euler-Maclaurin formula * = I, = 0, = 0, = 0 .

M FIG. IO.

J xo *u dx =* C I + [_h 2 u' + th *h4u'" -* s? Ohsuv *x= * J *x m. * x=xo, and an analogous formula (which may be obtained by substituting 2h and C, for *h* and C 1 in the above and then expressing T 1 as 2C *-CO) A* =J xo udx=T1+ *[4h2u'_+ * 15487$5 h8uvii ? . = x0 To apply these, the differential coefficients have to be expressed in terms of differences.

76 If we know not only the ordinates uo, ul,. .. or u I, U I,

, but also a sufficient number of the ordinates obtained by continuing the series outside the trapezette, at both extremities, we can use central-difference formulae, which are by far the most convenient. The formulae of § 75 give 11?

A=C I + h *[-121? 6u +* 7 1 20 / 1 ' 63u - O $Oµ65u+3.522489L-011671/ - ... xxm MU - RV - 0 7u g xxo A=T 1 + h [4 8u - rh 13u + g07 80 65u 4-`644K640oa7u+... ]m. x xo 77. If we do not know values of u outside the figure, we must use advancing or receding differences. The formulae usually employed are A = C1+h) *d 3 2 0u0-* 02u0+.1.186.z3u0-160p4uo+.. .

(((+i,'um-84a'2um+W125A'3um ifiO O ' 4u m +

. A =T1+h - 84 0u 1+2 1 4 A2u i - .3.272831743211z8°8364uI - .. .

- 24 m -2 *l 80y4um-3 * 80. *Moments of a Trapezette. - The* above methods can be applied, as in §§ 59 and 60, to finding the moments of a trapezette, when the data are a series of ordinates. To find the pth moment, when uo, u l, u 2, ... are given, we have only to find the area of a trapezette whose ordinates are xo P uo, **x** 1 'u 1, **x2** P u2,

81. There is, however, a certain set of cases, occurring in statistics, in which the data are not a series of ordinates, but the areas A I, A I,. .. A m _ I of the strips bounded by the consecutive ordinates uo, *72 1, ...* um. The determination of the moments in these cases involves special methods, which are considered in the next two sections.

82. The most simple case is that in which the trapezette tapers out in such a way that the curve forming its top has very close contact, at its extremities, with the base; in other words, the differential coefficients u', u", u"',. are practically negligible for *=* and for *x =x m .* The method adopted in these cases is to treat the areas A I, A I,. .. as if they were ordinates placed at the points for which *i x=x l, ... ,* to calculate the moments on this assumption, and then to apply certain corrections. If the first, second,. .. moments, so calculated, before correction are denoted by p 1, P21

, we have *pl* =xIA'I+xIA3?-...

P2 = x2 I A I + x 2 I A I +. .. + *-IAm * p p - x 2 1AI +x P IAg -F. .. -[- x P „,IA r _ These are called the *raw moments.* Then, if the true moments are denoted by Pi, v 2, ..., their values are given by vi ?Pl P2 - 11. p2 - ] 5h2po v3?P3-1h2pi, + .5hh4po v5Pp5 - h2p3+48h4p1 where po (or po) is the total area A; -}- Ag -}- ... -FA r _i; the general expression being *pf I* !?12! (p -2) ! h2 PP -2 + X 4! (* p* 4) *h* 4PP-4 - where X1 - 12, X2= 240, X 3 = Tit/, X 4 - S840, X 5 - $37 g 2,

The establishment of these formulae involves the use of the integral calculus.

The position of the central ordinate is given by x = v 1 /po, and therefore is given approximately by *pl/po.* To find the moments with regard to the central ordinate, we must use this approximate value, and transform by means of the formulae given in § 32. This can be done either before or after the above corrections are made. If the transformation is made first, and if the resulting raw moments with regard to the (approximate) central ordinate are o, 72, 71-3, ..., the true moments µ1, u2, /13, ...with regard to the central ordinate are given by Lo=o 1 i / h2,3 83. These results may be extended to the calculation of an expression of the form fxo u4(x)dx, where 0(x) is a definite function of *x,* and the conditions with regard to u are the same as in § 82.

(i) If cp(x) is an explicit function of *x,* we have (o ' n ud(x)dx?A3 I P(x 1)+ Ap P(x 3)+ ... *Am-I?(xm- * where (x)=Ih(x) 4h 2 0" (x) -i-ih 4 4, iv (x) - ..., the coefficients X i, X2 i .... having the values given in § 82.

(ii) If 4)(x) is not given explicitly, but is tabulated for the values.. x, x,. .. of *x,* the formula of (i) applies, provided we take (x)=(I - 24 62 +04?1 s4 -1-h-06 +

) Y' (x).

The formulae can be adapted to the case in which cp(x) is tabulated for *xl,. .. * 84. In cases other than those described in § 82, the pth moment with regard to the axis of u is given by Pp = *XPrA * where A is the total area of the original trapezette, and S 2 _ 1 is the area of a trapezette whose ordinates at successive distances *h,* beginning and ending with the bounding ordinates, are o, x1P -1A, **x2** P-1 (AI+AI),. xn= i(AI -?' AI {- ... + A m -), *xm* lA. The value of S 13 _ 1 has to be found by a quadrature-formula. The generalized formula is fxo u¢ (*x)dx = Aq(xm) - * where 0, A 2, ... have the usual meaning (Duo = u l - uo, L 2 uo = Du 1 - Auo, . .), and O', O' **2**, ... denote differences read backwards, so that 0'um = um-1 -um, A' 2 um = um-2 -!2um_1+ um,

The calculation of the expressions in brackets may be simplified by taking the pairs in terms from the outside; by finding the successive differences of uo + um, ill + um_l, ..., or of uI u i +umi, ..

An alternative method, which is in some ways preferable, is to complete the table of differences by repeating the differences of the highest order that will be taken into account (see Interpolation), and then to use central-difference formulae.

78. In order to find the corrections in respect of the terms shown in square brackets in the formulae of § 75, certain ordinates other than those used for C 1 or T I are sometimes found specially. *Parinentier's rule,* for instance, assumes that in addition to u I; u I.. u m _, we know uo and *um;* and *u I - uo* and u m - u m _ i are taken to be equal to zhu'o and Zhu'„, respectively. These methods are not to be recommended except in special cases.

79. By replacing *h* in § 75 by 2h, 3h,. .. and eliminating *h2u', Ott"',. .. ,* we obtain exact formulae corresponding to the approximate formulae of § 70. The following are the results (for the formulae involving chordal areas), given in terms of differential coefficients and of central differences. They are not so convenient as the formulae of § 76, but they serve to indicate the degree of accuracy of the approximate formulae. The expressions in square brackets are in each case to be taken as relating to the extreme values **x** =xo and x=xm, as in §§ 75 and 76.

(i) A=3(4C1-C2)+[- ii-uh4um+ iuiT h6uv -14406 h8uvii + ...

*= (4C1-* C2)+h[ ih/ 153u +T - 05 u 00 2()O/167u+... ].

A= ? C1-C3 + *[-Z5h4u"'* hsu .thanh8uvii = (9 C 1C 3)+ h [ 85µ 63u +6720 415u -4M 7 b0/i 17u '+.. .].

(iii) A= g(64C1-20C2+C4) - ... ] = 45(64C1-20C2+C4)+h[- $41;µ65utas - 0-07u- ... ].

A=io(15C1-6C2+C3)+[ - a4 h suv rx41ff-uhsuvii- ... 1 = 1 O(i 5 C 10 C2C 3) *+ h* [- 84T1 455 u. .. ].

A= (56C1-28C2+8C3-C4) +[- 20Oh8uvii J..

= x 1 (56C1-28C2+8C3-C4)+h[- 210Oµ 67 u+ ... ].

The general expression, if *p, q, r,.. .* are le of the factors of *m,* is A = PC P + QC / + r + ... + [ (-) kb k h2k d x 2k l 1)k+lbk+1h2k+2 *+ J* x = xo, where P, Q, R,. .. have the values given by the equations in § 71, and the coefficients *b k, bk+1, .* are found from the corresponding coefficients in the; uler-Maclaurin formula (§ 75) by multiplying them by Pp2k+(1g2k+Rr2k.. ., Pp2k+2+.Qg2k-1-2 Rr2k+2 ?.. .

i g h oo hsuvii where T is the area of a trapezette whose ordinates at successive distances *h* are o, Ali' (x i), (Al +A4) ,g 5' (x2), (Az +A 2 + ... - A„L_i)4'(x„1_i), **Ag5'(xm);** the accents denoting the first differential coefficient.

The application of the methods of §§ 75-79 to calculation of the volume of a briquette leads to complicated formulae. If the conditions are such that the methods of § 61 cannot be used, or are undesirable as giving too much weight to particular ordinates, it is best to proceed in the manner indicated at the end of § 48; *i.e.* to find the areas of one set of parallel sections, and treat these as the ordinates of a trapezette whose area will be the volume of the briquette.

86. The formulae of § 82 can be extended to the case of a briquette whose top has close contact with the base all along its boundary; the data being the volumes of the minor briquettes formed by the planes x =x0, x = x i,

and y = yo, y = Yi, The method of constructing the formulae is explained in § 62. If we write *-fxo f yox s yiu dx dy,* we first calculate the raw values coo., ai,o, 0.1,1,

of So,1, Si,o, S1,1,. on the assumption that the volume of each minor briquette is concentrated along its mid-ordinate (§ 44), and we then obtain the formulae of correction by multiplying the formulae of § 82 in pairs. Thus we find (e.g.) -2x1,1 52,1 2 x2,1 - i h2a o, .

S 1,2 2a 1,2 - 1 1 k20.10 52,2 ?? x 2,2 - k 2 a2,o - h 2 a6,2 +ia4h2k2ao,0 5 2x - 1100-1,1 5 2x h2x k2x3,o+41-gh2k°0-1,o where ao,o is the total volume of the briquette.

87. If the data of the briquette are, as in § 86, the volumes of the minor briquettes, but the condition as to close contact is not satisfied, we have y "`x P u dx dy = K + L + R - X111010-0,0 f xo yo i'? *y * where K-=4, X qth moment with regard to plane *y* =o, Lm yn X pth moment with regard to plane x =o, and R is the volume of a briquette whose ordinate at (*x,.,y s *) is found by multiplying by pq *x r P - 1 ys 4-1* the volume of that portion of the original briquette which lies between the planes **x** =xo, *y* =yo, *y = ys.* The ordinates of this new briquette at the points of intersection of x =x 0, x = xi,. .. with y =yo, *y* =y 1,. .. are obtained from the data by summation and multiplication; and the ordinary methods then apply for calculation of its volume. Either or both of the expressions K and L will have to be calculated by means of the formula of § 84; if this is applied to both expressions, we have a formula which may be written in a more general form f f 4 u4(x, *y) dx dy = u dx dy. q) * a J O l x f o *udxdy (1619(X q) dx * 4 P *u dx dy d 4)(b, y) dy dy * +. f b f 4 f x f P u *dx dy d x dy) dx dy. d * The second and third expressions on the right-hand side represent areas of trapezettes, which can be calculated from the data; and the fourth expression represents the volume of a briquette, to be calculated in the same way as R above.

When the sequence of differences is not such as to enable any of the foregoing methods to be applied, it is sometimes possible to amplify the data by measurement of intermediate ordinates, and then apply a suitable method to the amplified series. There is, however, a certain class of cases in which no subdivision of intervals will produce a good result; viz. cases in which the top of the figure is, at one extremity (or one part of its boundary), at right angles to the base. The Euler-Maclaurin formula (§ 75) assumes that the bounding values of *u', u"',.. .* are not infinite; this condition is not satisfied in the cases here considered. It is also clearly impossible to express *u* as an algebraical function of x and *y* if some value of *du/dx* or *duldy* is to be infinite.

No completely satisfactory methods have been devised for dealing with these cases. One method is to construct a table for interpolation of x in terms of *u,* and from this table to calculate values of x corresponding to values of *u,* proceeding by equal intervals; a quadrature-formula can then be applied. Suppose, for instance, that we require the area of the trapezette ABL in fig. II; the curve being at right angles to the base AL at A. If QD is the bounding ordinate of one of the component strips, we can calculate the area of Qdbl in the ordinary way. The data for the area ADQ are a series of values of *u* corresponding to equidifferent values of x; if we denote by *y* the distance of a point on the arc AD from QD, we can from the series of values of *u * construct a series of values of *y* corresponding to equidifferent values of *u,* and thus find the area of ADQ, treating QD as the base. The process, however, is troublesome.

The following are some examples of cases in which the above methods may be applied to the calculation of areas and integrals.

Even where *u* is an explicit function of *x,* so that f x udx may be expressed in terms of *x,* it is often more convenient, for construction of a table of values of such an integral, to use finite-difference formulae. The formula of § 76 may (see Differences, Calculus Of) be written f x *udx = h .µxu + h(- * 2 *µ6u +* 2 0 *=* (hu-- f 2 6 hu +.; 2 0 6 hu - udx *= h. au h (1146 u - = a (hu +* 5 6 2 hu - **6** +,-6 4 hu +. ..).

The second of these is usually the more convenient. Thus, to construct a table of values of f *x udx* by intervals of *h* in x, we first form a table of values of *hu* for the intermediate values of x, from this obtain a table of values of 62 * - * - ) hu* for these values of x, and then construct the table of f *x udx* by successive additions. Attention must be given to the possible accumulation of errors due to the small errors in the values of *u.* Each of the above formulae involves an arbitrary constant; but this disappears when we start the additions from 'a known value of *X udx. * The process may be repeated. Thus we have x f *x udx dx = (x +* 2 4 5 - ri o 6 3)2h2u = a2 62 ,A 1 80 *64* rs2 RI-vs *66 + ...)h2u =* a2(h2u * - 40 6 4 h 2 u). * Here there are two arbitrary constants, which may be adjusted in various ways.*

The formulae may be used for extending the accuracy of tables, in cases where, if *v* represents the quantity tabulated, *hdv/dx* or *h 2 d 2 v /dx 2* can be conveniently expressed in terms of *v* and x to a greater degree of accuracy than it could be found from the table. The process practically consists in using the table as it stands for improving the first or second differences of *v* and then building up the table afresh.

The use of quadrature-formulae is important in actuarial work, where the fundamental tables are based on experience, and the formulae applying these tables involve the use of the tabulated values and their differences.

90. The following are instances of the application of approximative formulae to the calculation of the volumes of solids.

To find the quantity of timber in a trunk with parallel ends, the areas of a few sections must be calculated as accurately as possible, and a formula applied. As the measurements can only be rough, the trapezoidal rule is the most appropriate in ordinary cases.

To measure the volume of a cask, it may be assumed that the interior is approximately a portion of a spheroidal figure. The formula applied can then be either Simpson's rule or a rule based on Gauss's theorem for two ordinates (§ 56). In the latter case the two sections are taken at distances t 2H/ A l 3 = = 2887H from the middle section, where H is the total internal length; and their arithmetic mean is taken to be the mean section of the cask. Allowance must of course be made for the thickness of the wood. 91. Certain approximate formulae for the length of an arc of a circle are obtained by methods similar to those of §§ 71 and 79. Let a be the radius of a circle, and 0 (circular measure) the unknown angle subtended by an arc. Then, if we divide 0 into *m* equal parts, and L 1 denotes the sum of the corresponding chords, so that L i =2ma sin (0/2m), the true length of the arc is L1 +a9 3 - 5 + ..., where cp. *=B/2m.* Similarly, if L2 repre sents the sum of the chords when m (assumed even) is replaced by 2m, we have an expression involving L2 and 20. The method of § 71 then shows that, by taking a (4L 0 - L 2) as the value of the arc, we get rid of terms in 0 2. If we use *c 1* to represent the chord of the whole arc, *c 2* the chord of half the arc, and c 4 the chord of one quarter of the arc, then corresponding to (i) and (iii) of § 70 or § 79 we have a (8c 2 - c i) and4 5 (256c 4 - 40c2+ci) as approximations to the length of the arc. The first of these is *Huygens's rule. * REFERENCES. - FOr applications of the prismoidal formula, see Alfred Lodge, *Mensuration for Senior Students* (1895). Other works on elementary mensuration are G. T. Chivers, *Elementary Mensuration* (1904); R. W. K. Edwards, *Elementary Plane and Solid Mensuration* (1902); William H. Jackson, *Elementary Solid Geometry* (1907); P. A. Lambert, *Computation and Mensuration* (1907). A. E. Pierpoint's *Mensuration Formulae* (1902) is a handy collection. Rules for calculation of areas are also given in such works as F. Castle, *Manual of Practical Mathematics* (1903); F. C. Clarke, *Practical Mathematics* (1907); C. T. Millis, *Technical Arithmetic and Geometry * (1903). For examples of measurement of areas by geometrical construction, see G. C. Turner, *Graphics applied to Arithmetic, Mensuration and Statics* (1907). Discussions of the approximate calculation of definite integrals will be found in works on the infinitesimal calculus; see *e.g.* E. Goursat, *A Course in Mathematical Analysis* (1905; trans. by E. R. Hedrick). For the methods involving finite differences, see references under DIFFERENCES, CALCULUS OF; and INTERPOLATION. On calculation of moments of graphs, see W. P. Elderton, *Frequency-Curves and Correlation* (1906); as to the formulae of § 82, see also *Biometrika,* v. 450. For mechanical methods of calculating areas and moments see CALCULATING MACHINES. (W. F. SH.)

**Encyclopedia Alphabetically**

A * B * C * D * E * F * G * H * I * J * K * L * M * N * O * P * Q * R * S * T * U * V * W * X * Y * Z

- Please bookmark this page (add it to your favorites)

- If you wish to **link** to this page, you can do so by referring to the URL address below.

```
https://theodora.com/encyclopedia/m/mensuration.html
```

This page was last modified 29-SEP-18

Copyright © 2021 ITA all rights reserved.